Report on External Proficiency Testing for the ABO and D Blood Group Typing Tests in Blood Centers (2014) / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: Korean Blood Safety Commission has implemented external proficiency testing (PT) for blood grouping test (BGT) to help improve the quality of blood centers since 2011. We analyzed the results of 2014 PT for BGT to help in planning the future PT for BGT and to improve the quality of blood centers. METHODS: Whole blood survey samples including three panels for ABO grouping and three panels for D typing were sent to 69 institutes. Evaluation criteria for BGT were as follows: 'Good' for answers matched with intended results, 'Acceptable' for correct answers other than that of 'Good', 'Unacceptable' for answers other than those of 'Good+acceptable' as correct answers; and 'Not graded' for answers in case of different answers in the two standard laboratories. RESULTS: All of the answer rates of 'Good' for D typing were 100%. However, the answer rates of 'Good' for cell typing, serum typing and interpretation for 14-ABO-2 samples with discrepant result between cell typing and serum typing were 39.1%, 29%, and 47.8%, respectively. Those of 'Unacceptable' for cell typing and interpretation for 14-ABO-2 samples were 2.8% and 1.4%. CONCLUSION: Because the answer rates of ABO grouping for samples with discrepant result between cell typing and serum typing were not high, education for this case is needed. Diversity of materials for PT would be necessary for more accurate evaluation of the performance of BGT in blood centers.

Report on External Proficiency Testing for the ABO and D Blood Typing in Blood Centers in 2012 and 2013 / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: It was reported that a continuous education program and external proficiency testing (PT) for blood grouping test (BGT) might be necessary because some blood centers of medical institutions could not correctly examine ABO subtype and D variant, according to the results of the first year project in 2011. Therefore, the results of PT for BGT in blood centers in 2012 and 2013 were compared to those in 2011 in order to assess the impact of projects during a period of three years and to help in planning the future PT for BGT. METHODS: Whole blood survey samples composed of three panels for ABO grouping and three panels for D typing were sent to 74 and 71 institutes in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Evaluation criteria for BGT were as follows: 'Good' for the answers matched with intended results, 'Acceptable' for the correct answers other than that of 'Good', and 'Unacceptable' for the answers other than those of 'Good+acceptable' as correct answers. RESULTS: The answer rates of 'Unacceptable' for ABO subtype were 1.4% in 2012 and 4.2% in 2013. However, the answer rate of 'Good' increased from 44.6% in 2012 to 83.1% in 2013. The answer rate of 'Unacceptable' for D variants showed a marked decrease, from 16.2% in 2012 to 1.4% in 2013. CONCLUSION: Projects for PT for BGT during a period of three years have improved laboratory quality in blood centers. However, the acquisition and change of the materials for PT would be necessary in order to continuously and practically provide help to blood centers.

Report on External Proficiency Testing for Blood Grouping Tests in Blood Centers (2011) / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: To ensure safety of blood transfusion, accuracy in performance of blood grouping tests (BGT) is essential. External proficiency testing (PT) for BGT has not been conducted in Korea. The first PT for BGT in domestic blood centers was conducted in order to evaluate the domestic status of accuracy of BGT in blood centers and to aid in improving the quality of blood centers. METHODS: Whole blood survey specimens consisting of three panels for ABO grouping and two panels for Rh typing were sent to 81 blood centers. Evaluation criteria for BGT were as follows: 'Good' for answers with 100% referee consensus, 'Acceptable' for correct answers other than those of the referee, and 'Unacceptable' for answers other than those of 'Good+acceptable' as correct answers. RESULTS: Rates of correct answers on three panels for ABO grouping were all 100%; however, that of cell typing for the panel with BW was 61.7%, and 31 blood centers incorrectly reported normal 'B' type as an answer. The rate of correct answers for the Rh negative panel was 100%; however, that for the weak D panel was 84%, and 13 blood centers incorrectly reported Rh negative type as an answer. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study demonstrated that some hospital blood centers were not able to correctly detect blood groups with weak antigens. Therefore, to improve the quality of blood centers, intensive education for blood center staff and continued PT for BGT should be required.

External Quality Assurance Survey for the Blood Donor Screening Tests Performed in 2010 / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: To prevent blood-borne infections and guarantee safe transfusion, we proposed a quality assurance program for donor screening tests, such as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV), by introducing external proficiency testing for the laboratories that perform donor screening tests. METHODS: The materials for external proficiency testing (PT) were prepared from the HBsAg Standard Panels and anti-HCV Reference Panels provided by the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA), and the normal Human Serum was provided by the Serum Bank of the Korea National Research Resource Center. The external PT materials were sent to 83 laboratories that performed donor screening tests after evaluating their quality. RESULTS: The results of evaluating the quality of the PT materials were acceptable. All the laboratories receiving the materials answered with a 100% response rate. All the laboratories answered that they obtained positive results for the HBsAg Standard Panel E, H, I and J; however, one laboratory answered in the gray-zone and that lab had negative results for HBsAg Standard Panel C and G. Seventy laboratories (84%) and 42 laboratories (51%) among the total 83 laboratories answered they had positive results for HBsAg Standard Panel B and D, suggesting that many laboratories could not detect a low level of HBsAg. All 83 laboratories answered that they had concordant results for the external PT for anti-HCV. CONCLUSION: Donor screening laboratories can detect low levels of HBsAg and anti-HCV without any errors and the performance of the laboratories that could not detect low levels of HBsAg remains to be improved. Quality assurance program using external PT with materials that contain various genotypes and mutants should be conducted to maintain the quality of donor screening tests.